Cap rate answers "how much does this property earn relative to its price, regardless of how anyone finances it." Cash-on-cash answers "how much am I actually getting back on the cash I am putting in, given my specific loan." They start from the same rent and expense figures and split apart the moment a mortgage payment enters the picture.
| Metric | Formula | Ignores |
|---|---|---|
| Cap Rate | NOI / Purchase Price | Financing entirely |
| Cash-on-Cash Return | Annual Cash Flow / Cash Invested | Appreciation, equity paydown |
Cap rate needs only two inputs you already have off a listing sheet: NOI and price. That makes it the number to pull first, when you are comparing several properties and have not gotten loan quotes on any of them yet. It also runs in reverse: if comparable properties in a market trade around a 6 percent cap rate and a listing's NOI is $16,200, the market-implied value is $270,000 ($16,200 divided by 0.06), a fast way to sense-check whether an asking price is out of line with local income levels.
Purchase price $310,000. Gross annual rent $27,600. Annual operating expenses $9,700 (vacancy, taxes, insurance, maintenance, management). Annual mortgage payment (25% down loan) $15,900. Cash invested (down payment plus closing costs) $84,500.
$27,600 - $9,700 = $17,900
$17,900 / $310,000 = 5.8%
$17,900 - $15,900 = $2,000
$2,000 / $84,500 = 2.4%
Same duplex, same rent roll: a 5.8 percent cap rate next to a 2.4 percent cash-on-cash return. Debt service accounts for the entire gap. Change the down payment or the rate and both numbers shift, but rarely by the same amount.
When a mortgage rate sits below the cap rate, leverage works in your favor and cash-on-cash return can exceed cap rate, a condition called positive leverage. That was common during periods of very cheap financing. It flips the other direction just as easily.
If borrowing costs run high relative to the property's yield, debt service can eat most or all of the NOI, dragging cash-on-cash below cap rate, sometimes into negative territory even while cap rate itself looks perfectly reasonable. This is negative leverage, and it is the exact scenario the shared example above walks through.
Neither metric accounts for taxes. Rental income and expenses land on IRS Schedule E, where depreciation and mortgage interest can meaningfully lower taxable income without moving either cap rate or cash-on-cash by a dollar. The IRS details deductible rental expenses at Tax Topic 414.
A strong cap rate paired with a weak cash-on-cash figure often points to overleveraging at the current rate rather than a bad property; the same deal might screen fine with more money down or at a lower rate. A high cash-on-cash figure riding on an unusually low cap rate deserves a second look at whether the financing behind it survives a refinance. Run both, and treat neither one as a final answer on its own.
Cap rate first, since it needs only NOI and price and lets you compare several properties before you have loan quotes on any of them. Run cash-on-cash once you have a real rate and down payment for the one property you are seriously considering.
Yes, when the mortgage rate sits below the cap rate. Leverage amplifies the return in that case, a pattern known as positive leverage that shows up whenever borrowing is cheap relative to the property's yield.
Yes. Property taxes reduce NOI as an operating expense, which lowers cap rate. Always confirm exactly which costs a seller included when quoting NOI, since sellers routinely leave expenses out of that figure.
On Schedule E of Form 1040. The IRS lists which rental expenses qualify as deductions at Tax Topic 414 on irs.gov.

Before she wrote about loans, Jessica underwrote them, which left her with a permanent habit of asking what a number leaves out before she asks what it shows. That habit shapes most of what runs on this site.